Vital Market Signs When FOMC Met Previously

January 28, 2009

  EUR/$ $/JPY 10Y, % DJIA Oil, $
06/30/04 1.2173 109.44 4.63 10396 37.95
06/30/05 1.2090 110.89 3.96 10370 57.00
06/29/06 1.2527 116.07 5.20 11077 73.41
06/28/07 1.3452 123.17 5.10 13456 69.82
08/07/07 1.3749 118.55 4.73 13510 72.27
09/18/07 1.3888 115.75 4.51 13475 81.42
10/31/07 1.4458 115.28 4.42 13873 93.59
12/11/07 1.4682 111.49 4.11 13645 89.78
01/30/08 1.4792 107.31 3.70 12454 91.70
03/18/08 1.5786 98.73 3.41 12257 107.53
04/30/08 1.5562 104.58 3.83 12953 111.54
06/25/08 1.5568 108.37 4.18 11837 133.62
08/05/08 1.5445 108.42 3.97 11484 119.82
09/16/08 1.4144 105.16 3.36 10936 91.18
10/08/08 1.3625 99.87 3.50 9447 87.02
10/29/08 1.2933 97.15 3.81 9145 67.38
12/16/08 1.3790 90.14 2.52 8687 44.14
01/28/09 1.3234 89.71 2.53 8321 41.51

 

In the six weeks since the FOMC last gathered and cut the Fed funds target to a band of 0.0-0.25% from 1.0%, ten-year Treasury yields have been steady on balance.  Although 0.5% weaker against the Japanese yen, the dollar has recouped 4.2% against the euro and about that same amount against a trade-weighted index of other currencies.  Such appreciation would exert a similar effect on the U.S. economy as a rate hike of 40-50 basis points, neutralizing half the stimulus of December’s rate cut.  Stock prices are 4.2% lower now than then, and oil prices have eased another 6% but been unable to sustain sub-$40 levels.  Economic news in the U.S. and world darkened, and the situation of many financial institutions grew more dire. 

Presidential power was transferred to the Democrats, and it quickly became clear that Obama’s call for a new bipartisanship would be ignored.  Despite a much bigger voter mandate than when Bush beat Gore eight years ago, President Obama will have a much harder time legislating fiscal change than Bush did in 2001.  That probably translates into more delay in implementing a stimulus and greater-than-expected compromise in the composition of the economic support.

A considerable burden still rests on monetary policy.  But the Fed’s scope for reducing nominal short-term interest rates is now exhausted.  The statement that will be issued in just over three hours takes on even more importance than before.  It will be tempting for officials to speak in broad terms, pledging to do whatever is required.  One challenge is to convince the business, investor, and voting public that the Fed is issuing more than words and that a basis exists  for confidence about the future.

Copyright 2009 Larry Greenberg.  All rights reserved. No secondary distribution without express permission.

Tags:

ShareThis

Comments are closed.

css.php